This Report presents nine guidelines for assessing Open Government Partnership (OGP) Participating States’ action plans. The development and implementation of action plans is central to the whole OGP project: they contain the concrete commitments made by Participating States and hence the standards against which performance is measured. The guidelines are designed to be used by local stakeholders to assess the quality of country action plans.
CLD drafted a submission on freedom of expression and the right to information as a stakeholder submission to the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process on Canada.
Centre for Law and Democracy, in collaboration with The Asia Foundation, published this report which explores what openness means in the context of election commissions. The Report examines practices around the world to establish recommendations for better practice standards of transparency in election commissions. Among the Report’s recommendations are that election commissions should publish comprehensive legal information about the regulatory framework around elections, detailed candidate information and easy-to-understand factsheets for citizens about the electoral process. Election commissions should also be fully transparent in their decision-making and adjudicative processes, and aim to distribute information so that it is as accessible to the broader population as possible. The Report has been translated into Bahasa Indonesian. UPDATE: The Report has also been translated into Arabic
The Government of Myanmar is preparing a press law which is supposed to significantly democratise regulation of the print media, an important part of its overall plans to become a democracy. In order to help ensure that the law promotes press freedom, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), working with the Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA), has published a report, Myanmar: Guidance for Journalists on Promoting an Empowering Press Law. The Report is also available in Burmese
This Report examines the strength of RTI reform in the OGP, noting that only 30% of Action Plans submitted by countries contain pledges to substantially improve their RTI framework.
The Centre for Law and Democracy published a major Report examining the Internet from the perspective of human rights. It analyses the critical role that the Internet plays in the actualisation of fundamental human rights, particularly the right to freedom of expression, and concludes that there is a human right of access to the Internet. The Report also examines the implications of the right to freedom of expression in terms of regulation of the Internet.
CLD published a comparative report on international and comparative constitutional guarantees of the right to information. The report, Entrenching RTI: An Analysis of Constitutional Protections of the Right to Information, is part of CLD’s ongoing work to support right to information reform in Egypt. At the same time, the standards outlined in the report are relevant to any country undergoing constitutional reform in this area. The report outlines in some detail international standards recognising as a human right the right to access information held by public authorities, as well as the specific standards for this right which have been developed in international law. It also describes the main features found in most constitutional guarantees of the right to information, along with some of the more cutting edge features found in some recent constitutions.
The report is also available in Arabic.
CLD published a comparative analysis of the rules relating to paid political advertising, with a specific focus on elections, Regulation of Paid Political Advertising: A Survey. The analysis was compiled at the behest of members of Indonesia’s Press Council, which is faced with the issue of how to ensure democratic media participation in elections. The Analysis examines different country frameworks for regulating political advertising during election campaigns, and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches. Although no single regulatory formula can be said to be a model, and different cultural contexts may support the adoption of different systems, a major conclusion of the analysis is that countries tend to loosen restrictions over time, and that once moneyed interests are allowed to exert a significant interest in the electoral process it is extremely difficult to counteract this. As a result, a good lesson for countries, such as Indonesia, that are in the process of establishing regulatory frameworks is to err on the side of more stringent regulations to start with, since politically it is easier to relax these regulations than to tighten them.
This comparative Study on the regulation of broadcasting to protect children was launched at a workshop organised by UNESCO and the Brazilian Ministry of Justice. The Study analyses international standards in this area and compares the practice of six democracies with the system in place in Brazil. It concludes that the Brazilian system is largely in line with international standards, but two problem areas are the regulatory role played by the Ministry of Justice, a government body, and the undue complexity of the system.
At a major conference in Jakarta on March 5, CLD and Yayasan 28 launched a publication entitled Implementation of the Right to Information: An Assessment of Three Indonesian Public Authorities. The publication explores the steps that have been made by three agencies, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education and the National Police Headquarters, in implementing their RTI obligations, and contrasts these efforts with international standards. It was written by Kristian Erdianto and Dyah Aryani of Yayasan 28 and CLD’s Legal Officer Michael Karanicolas.
CLD and the Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (ICEL) have launched a new publication entitled Interpretation of Exceptions to the Right to Information: Experiences in Indonesia and Elsewhere. The book explores approaches in Indonesia to five exceptions to the right to information, for privacy, internal information, law enforcement, commercial interests and natural resources, and contrasts them with international standards. The work was authored authored by Dessy Eko Prayitno (ICEL), Henri Subagiyo (ICEL), Josi Khatarina (ICEL), Prayekti Murharjanti (ICEL), Rifqi S. Assegaf (ICEL), Toby Mendel (CLD), Michael Karanicolas (CLD).
The book is available in English as well as in Bahasa Indonesian.
In recent years, the openness of international financial institutions (IFIs) has improved considerably. An ongoing problem area, however, is the overbroad regimes of exceptions in IFI transparency policies and, in particular, the exceptions relating to internal deliberations and third-party commercial information. A new report by CLD – Openness Policies of the International Financial Institutions: Failing to Make the Grade with Exceptions – examines how these exceptions are dealt with at the national level, contrasting that with the much more secretive approach of the IFIs.
The report, which CLD produced as a member of the Global Transparency Initiative (GTI), explores in detail the way each of the two exceptions have been interpreted at the national level in better practice jurisdictions. It then contrasts this with the policies of the IFIs, thereby highlighting how the IFI approach is in almost every case overly broad, often by a wide margin. The GTI has always maintained that the IFIs, as organisations which are supported by public money and which perform public functions, are subject to the same disclosure obligations under international law as other public authorities.
CLD supported Indonesia’s SET Foundation in preparing and publishing this Report on Indonesia’s draft State Secrecy Bill entitled, “A Burst of Sunlight but Darkness Looms”. The Report was prepared by Agus Sudibyo and edited by CLD Legal Officer Michael Karanicolas with support from Toby Mendel.
The Centre for Law and Democracy released a Commentary on the Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet, providing a detailed analysis of the implications of a range of fundamental human rights for the Internet. The Charter itself was prepared by the Internet Rights and Principles Coalition, which in turn arose out of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), a tri-partite gathering bringing together civil society, governments and the commercial sector to discuss regulatory issues relating to the Internet. The Commentary reviews the implications of a wide range of human rights for the Internet, including rights of systematic relevance, such as non-discrimination, freedom of expression and privacy, and more thematic rights, such as the rights to education, culture and work.
This Note is a legal analysis of the cases of five Burmese video-journalists which discloses flagrant breaches of human rights. The analysis found widespread abuses of the rights to freedom of expression, freedom of association and freedom from torture. The violations result from both the Burmese government’s abusive application of laws that restrict freedom of expression, and their capricious application of broader legislation to target political opponents.
CLD prepared this discussion of the June 2011 Joint Declaration by the Four Special International Mandates for Protecting Freedom of Expression on Freedom of Expression and the Internet.
Almost 90 countries around the world have enacted access to information (ATI) legislation, and in many of these countries, reforms and amendments are either being considered or have been passed. However, even minor adjustments to the legal framework around ATI laws can have substantial impact on how the law is implemented and used. In order to address the challenges of access to information reform, the World Bank Institute has recently published this working paper by Toby Mendel, Executive Director of Centre for Law and Democracy. The paper looks at the main substantive issues ATI reform attempts have targeted and what legal forms they may take. It also examines the role different actors—civil society, the media, oversight bodies, parliaments, and political leaders—can play in helping support the adoption of reforms that promote openness and defeat those that erect barriers.
It is legitimate for states to exempt information whose release would be prejudicial to national security from their disclosure laws. But in order to insure that this exemption is not abused it is important to develop an acceptably narrow definition of what constitutes national security.
To this end, the Centre for Law and Democracy has produced a paper examining how national security should be defined in the context of information disclosure. The paper was produced as a contribution to the “Principles on National Security and the Right to Information” currently being developed by the Open Society Initiative.
Click here for more information on the Issues Paper
The Centre for Law and Democracy is pleased to announce the publication of the second edition of “Public Service Broadcasting: a Comparative Legal Survey”. This edition, authored by CLD’s Executive Director Toby Mendel, explores the legal and regulatory systems governing public service broadcasters in eight different countries around the world. The book examines how different democracies protect the independence of public broadcasters while providing them with the resources necessary to fulfill their mandates.
The launch took place at the World Summit on the Information Society Forum on 18 May 2011 in Geneva, Switzerland. UNESCO, which is publishing the book, stated that they expected it to “serve as an authoritative source of information from countries around the world, as a friend for broadcasters to help them solve some of the issues they are currently facing in their own organizations.”
Click here for more information on the Publication
The publisher of the Winston Report, a publication of The Canadian Association of Professional Access and Privacy Administrators (CAPAPA), asked CLD for a piece describing its structure, focus and work. This piece was published in their Autumn 2010 edition.
Presented at the 21st International Congress of Historical Sciences, held in Amsterdam in August 2010, on a panel on History and Human Rights, this paper explores the differences between legal and self-regulatory rules on defamation, privacy and racist speech. It draws on the relatively developed self-regulatory rules in the area of the media, drawing some conclusions for self-regulation by historians.
UPDATE: A revised version of this paper was published in the academic journal Storia della Storiografia, available here
Prepared for the Winston Report, a publication of The Canadian Association of Professional Access and Privacy Administrators (CAPAPA), this editorial outlines the key holdings in the June 2010 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada finding a right to access information held by public bodies as part of the general guarantee of freedom of expression in section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
This in-depth Report, prepared jointly by eight organisations, builds on the UNESCO report on the Media Development Indicators, extending the analysis beyond the traditional media to the digital communications environment. It applies the same categories of analysis as the MDIs – namely the regulatory framework, diversity, media and democratic discourse, capacity building and infrastructure – to digital communications.
This review discusses the Joint Declaration adopted on 3 February 2010 by the four special IGO mandates for protecting freedom of expression – the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, the OAS Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information.
This paper outlines the main issues raised by presenters on the first plenary panel of UNESCO’s main World Press Freedom Day event in Brisbane, Australia. Key themes addressed include the transition from freedom of information to a right to information, the implications of a right to information for access to information legislation, persistent problems of implementation of the right to information and the special role of the media in promoting this key right.
This document provides an outline of the key elements of a legal framework for freedom of expression and the media which is consistent with international standards. It was prepared to provide guidance to legislators, policy-makers and civil society groups in Kyrgyzstan in the aftermath of the April overthrow of the government, which gave rise to a window of opportunity for legislative reform. It is broken down into content and media regulation issues, and sets out the rules in various different areas under these headings.
This short paper on the history of the development of access to information from governance reform to human right was prepared by Toby Mendel, Executive Director, CLD, for UNESCO’s Quito Office. They presented the paper as part of their regional celebrations for World Press Freedom Day, 2010.
This paper is the text of a speech given by Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD, to UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC). It was based on a report authored by Mendel and published by UNESCO which applied the Media Development Indicators to the Maldives. The paper describes the process of applying the Indicators, and their strengths and weaknesses, drawing some conclusions for future assessment exercises.
This paper, which was prepared as a background document for meetings by the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, provides a comprehensive analysis of the scope and nature of restrictions on freedom of expression under international law, posing questions for further thought. It analyses, among others, the scope of the right, including positive obligations, what constitutes an interference with freedom of expression, the three-part test for restrictions on this right, and positive obligations to restrict freedom of expression (such as hate speech rules).
This paper, published as IRIS 2010-5:1/1, reviews the Joint Declaration adopted on 3 February 2010 by the four special IGO mandates for protecting freedom of expression – the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, the OAS Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information. The Declaration was adopted with the assistance of CLD.
This paper is a contribution to a book published in Macedonia called the Black Book of Shame, which focuses on attempts by the powerful to silence the media and others using legal tools in the post-communist period. The paper outlines international standards regarding hate speech, with a particular focus on the constitutive elements of a crime of hate speech which is compatible with freedom of expression guarantees.
This Report, which followed on from a mission to Mongolia in December 2009 in collaboration with the Asia-Pacific Institute for Broadcasting Development and the Mongolia National Broadcaster, provides a wide-ranging assessment of regulatory needs in relation to the media in Mongolia. It addresses, among other things, the need for a general broadcasting law, the situation of the public broadcaster, threats to independence of the media, the need for a right to information law and the problem of criminal defamation provisions.
This Study, produced by Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD in 2006 for the UN Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide provides an in-depth analysis of the different international law rules on incitement to genocide and racial hatred, comparing the different rules and probing the way that the concept of incitement has been treated under both of them.