Centre for Law and Democracy

22 September 2025.

The Canadian province of New Brunswick is undertaking a review of its right to information law and, as part of this process, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) has prepared a Submission on New Brunswick’s Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The Act earns just 75 out of a possible 150 points, or 50%, on CLD’s RTI Rating, placing it among the weakest Canadian jurisdictions and, were it a country, in 89^th place out of the 140 countries which are currently assessed on the RTI Rating. The Act does particularly poorly in terms of promotional measures, scope and exceptions, and the CLD Submission provides numerous recommendations to address these weaknesses.

“New Brunswick is currently languishing at the bottom of Canadian jurisdictions in terms of both its legal framework for RTI and performance in implementing its law,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “This review presents a real opportunity for New Brunswick to change that by adopting a robust RTI law and then moving on to address the culture of secrecy in the province.”

Some of the key recommendations in the Submission are as follows:

• The scope of the Act should be expanded to cover all three branches of government, all bodies which are owned or controlled by those branches, and private bodies which perform public functions or operate with significant public funding.
• The time limits for responding to requests should be shortened and the rule on not charging fees, currently set out in a regulation, should be incorporated into the primary legislation.
• The regime of exceptions should be overhauled to limit exceptions to those which are internationally recognised as legitimate, to subject all exceptions to a harm test and public interest override, and to impose sunset clauses on all exceptions protecting public interests.
• The oversight body should be able to issue binding decisions and to review all information, regardless of claims of secrecy.
• All public bodies should be required to report annually on their implementation of the Act.

The Submission is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director, Centre for Law and Democracy
toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @Law_Democracy
BlueSky: @law-democracy.bsky.social
LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/company/centre-for-law-and-democracy

28 August 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy has signed onto a joint letter urging the withdrawal of the Maldives Media and Broadcasting Regulation Bill. The letter states that the bill “poses a grave threat to press freedom and media independence in the Maldives and should be withdrawn immediately in the interests of democracy and the public’s right to know”.

The full letter can be viewed here.

27 August 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) has prepared a Note for IPCM Members on Free and Fair Elections, to help guide the independent Myanmar media, and especially members of the Independent Press Council of Myanmar (IPCM), on how to report objectively on the upcoming promised elections. The military regime currently running Myanmar announced earlier this month that the “first phase” of the upcoming elections will be held on 28 December 2025. CLD’s Note sets out in a simple format the key standards for free and fair elections, to support independent media wishing to report impartially on whether the Myanmar elections meet those standards.

“It is abundantly clear to independent observers that the basic conditions for free and fair elections – including respect for core freedoms, such as freedom of expression and of association – are not in place in Myanmar,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “This Note is designed to help independent media outlets understand the core standards for free and fair elections so these outlets can report objectively and precisely on whether the electoral process meets those standards.”

The Note starts with a one and one-half page Overview of Key Standards, which is followed by an Introduction, setting out the key international law guarantees for free and fair elections, before elaborating more deeply on each of the key standards. The eight key standards are as follows: Respect for Fundamental Freedoms; Respect for the Results of Elections; Periodic Elections; Violence; Universal Suffrage; Secret Ballot; Independent Oversight; and Appeals. The Note elaborates on the content of each standard, but not on the extent to which they are currently being respecting in Myanmar. However, CLD has reported extensively on how the military regime is breaching international guarantees of fundamental freedoms; these reports are available on our Myanmar Resource Page.

While the Note is aimed primarily at independent Myanmar media, it should be a useful resource for any media outlets wishing to report on the rollout of the elections in Myanmar.

The Note is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

2 July 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) is today publicly launching its Submission on Prince Edward Island’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The Submission was provided in response to a call for public input into the review by the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island (PEI) of this Canadian province’s right to information law. The submission assesses the law using CLD’s RTI Rating and assigns a middling score of 94 out of 150 possible points.

“One of the positive features of PEI’s right to information law is that it provides for reviews by a standing committee of the Legislative Assembly every six years,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “We hope that this review will lead to meaningful reforms to the law, several aspects of which should be updated to reflect international standards and better practices.”

CLD’s submission provides several recommendations for improvement, including that:

• The scope of the law should be expanded to apply fully to all information held by the executive, legislative and judicial branches, as well as private bodies which perform a public function or receive significant public funding, to the extent of that funding, with no exclusions for any categories of information or any bodies.
• Consideration should be given to requiring requests to be processed as soon as possible and within 15 days, absent an extension or transfer, and to cap extensions at 30 days.
• The regime of exceptions should be revised to remove problematic exceptions and to subject all exceptions to a harm test.
• Care should be given to ensuring that the Information and Privacy Commissioner’s office is adequately staffed and resourced, so as to be able to reduce its backlog and complete reviews in a timely manner.

CLD’s submission is available here, and the rating is available for download here.

For further information, please contact:

Raphael Vagliano
Legal Officer
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: raphael@law-democracy.org
+1 514 506-0948
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

26 June 2025.

This year, for the first time ever, civil society organisations (CSOs) held a parallel NGO Day event alongside the closed event for officials at the annual International Conference of Information Commissioners (ICIC), held in Berlin this year. Participants in the NGO Day event, held on 25 June 2025, adopted the Berlin CSO Declaration on the Right to Information and Environmental Justice, setting out key commitments for CSOs, alongside calls for action from States, the ICIC and all stakeholders.

“It is really exciting that, after more than 20 years, the ICIC has finally instituted this parallel event, providing a very welcome opportunity for CSOs, working as a community, to focus on issues of concern to us, something we rarely get to do” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “The Declaration captures some of the more important issues for CSOs today, with a particular focus on the huge challenges of shrinking civic space for CSOs in many countries.”

The Declaration commits CSOs to work collectively to promote the right to information and access to environmental information, to continue to focus advocacy efforts on addressing ongoing attacks on civil space and to work to increase collaboration and the sharing of best practices. Given that the Declaration was adopted alongside the official ICIC event, it includes two key calls to the ICIC, namely to institutionalise holding a parallel civil society gathering alongside the ICIC and to continue to support the engagement of civil society representatives in the ICIC.

The majority of the calls in the Declaration are for States. These include a call to adopt, as necessary, strong right to information laws, including by providing for “strong, independent and sufficiently resourced administrative oversight bodies”, as well as to ensure proper implementation of those laws. The Declaration also calls on States to respect freedom of association and to “provide funding and other forms of support for advocacy and other work in the areas of the right to information and environmental justice”.

The Declaration is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

9 June 2025.

Over the last 20 plus years, different official actors in Canada have conducted repeated reviews of the federal Access to Information Act (ATIA), despite which reform of the Act remains a pressing need. Today, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), with the support of 18 organisations and individuals, sent a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney calling on him to ensure that the upcoming review, due to start later this month, is “genuine and timely” and takes place “under the guidance of an independent panel with a broad mandate to consider all reform needs”.

“The last thing we need right now is another pro forma review of the ATIA, which would simply be a waste of valuable time and money,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “During the recent election, Carney promised a review of the Act, indicating that an ‘objective review … would serve Canadians well’; now is the time to deliver on that promise.”

Every independent observer recognises that the ATIA is not fit for purpose. It earns only 93 points out of a possible total of 150 on CLD’s respected RTI Rating, sits in a dismal 53^rd position globally out of the 140 countries with right to information laws and fails to deliver on its main promise, i.e. government transparency. Despite that, the 2022 report to Parliament on the last review of the ATIA, conducted by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS), did not recommend changes to the Act but instead focused on improving practice. That was a repudiation of the input of independent observers and an insult to the experience of users of the Act.

The Act mandates reviews every five years, which means that another review should be launched later this month. As a duty holder under the Act, it is a conflict of interest for TBS to conduct the review, and this conflict is reflected in the inadequate conclusions of the last review. For us, the “objective review” which Prime Minister Carney called for means a review by an independent panel with a broad mandate and adequate resources to hold proper consultations before reaching its conclusions. Our letter includes a draft Terms of Reference for such a review and calls on the Prime Minister to conduct the upcoming review in line with those Terms of Reference.

The letter is available in English here and in French here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

20 May 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) today released its analysis of proposed amendments to Puerto Rico’s Access to Information Act, in the form of Senate Bill 63. Rather than improving the legal environment for access to information in Puerto Rico, the amendments would reduce the score of Puerto Rico from 73 to 69 points out of a possible total of 150 on CLD’s respected RTI Rating, dropping it from the equivalent of 94^th to 106^th position globally out of the 140 countries with right to information laws.

“Puerto Rico already has a very weak legal framework for guaranteeing the right to access information held by government, despite having a constitutional guarantee for this,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “Instead of weakening it further, the government should undertake a comprehensive review with the aim of significantly improving the legislation.”

The proposed changes which result in points losses on the RTI Rating all relate to requesting procedures, and are specifically the following issues:

• • Additional, unnecessary information required when making a request.
  • Additional barriers to lodging a request in the form of being required to lodge it with the head of the public authority while also needing to copy the information officer.
  • The removal of any requirement to provide access to information in the format preferred by the requester.
  • Changes to the regime for extending the time limit to respond to requests which would allow for up to 20 additional days, without any conditions (in addition to extending the original time limit from 10 to 20 days).

Other unfortunate changes include extending secrecy to cover any information which has been classified and the removal of a requirement for information officers to remove personal information when reporting on requests.

CLD’s analysis is available here and the Bill is available in Spanish here and in an informal English translation here. The bolded text represents proposed removals and the text in italics proposed additions.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

5 May 2025.

The Maldives’ Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and Transparency Maldives (TM) recently published their Comprehensive Assessment on the Implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act in the Maldives. This assessment was conducted in collaboration with the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) using its comprehensive methodology for assessing RTI implementation. The methodology evaluates the quality of RTI implementation in four key areas: central measures (which, in the case of the Maldives, focuses on the Information Commissioner’s performance), institutional measures at public authorities, proactive disclosure practices and reactive disclosure or responding to requests for information. 

Data for the assessment was collected from a sample of 30 public authorities drawn from across different sectors including ministries and departments, independent institutions, courts, local councils and State-owned enterprises.  

The Maldives received an overall yellow score (0.56 out of 1.00) which signifies that while there were some positive results, there is still a lot of room for improvement across the board. 

Key Findings: 

• • Timeliness of Information Requests: Only 38% of requests were responded to in full within the period prescribed in the law. While public authorities acknowledged and responded to requests within the stipulated time, the actual information requested was often not provided. Only 45% of requests resulted in the provision of all of the information requested, while some information often arrived late. 

• • Lack of RTI Implementation Plans: None of the public authorities assessed had adopted RTI implementation plans. This absence leads to significant delays and instances of requests getting lost altogether. Public authorities are urged to develop detailed implementation plans to streamline the processing of requests. 

• • Need for Enhanced Online Infrastructure: Proactive disclosure remains the weakest aspect of RTI implementation. One challenge is the lack of websites which meet disclosure standards. Efforts should be made to develop and maintain websites for local councils and smaller public authorities, while also ensuring that information is accessible in other ways if websites are not feasible. 
  • Challenges Faced by RTI Practitioners: Although information officers denied being under pressure to keep information secret RTI practitioners and journalists reported delays and withholding of information, indicating possible fear of reprisal or institutional reluctance. Journalists feel targeted, with authorities often extending deadlines without justification. 

Key Recommendations: 

The Maldives’ Information Commissioner’s Office and Transparency Maldives make the following key recommendations to promote effective RTI implementation:

• • Institutional Capacity Building: The development of online infrastructure for public authorities to support proactive disclosures should be prioritised, including the allocation of necessary funding and technical support for website maintenance. 

• • Alternative Information Disclosure Methods: Alternative means for disclosing information should be used by institutions which lack the ability to disclose online. 
  • Staff Capacity Building: The skills of relevant staff, especially information officers, should be enhanced so as to increase accountability, while institutional RTI implementation plans should be developed with a view to streamlining and improving information provision. 

It is essential that a concerted effort be made by public authorities, oversight bodies and civil society so as to ensure that the right to information is not only protected by law but realised in practice.

The full report can be found here. A summary of the results of this and previous evaluations can be found on this page, to which assessments of other countries will be added as they are completed.

For further information, please contact:

Raphael Vagliano
Legal Officer
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: raphael@law-democracy.org
+1 514 506-0948
www.law-democracy.org
Twitter: @law_democracy

28 April 2025.

You are invited to a webinar hosted by the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) on international freedom of expression standards on the right to information, and on restrictions on this right and freedom of expression on national security grounds. The webinar will feature a presentation from CLD introducing international standards on the right to information and a second presentation split into two parts, the first on national security restrictions on the right to information and the second on national security and freedom of expression.

The webinar is open to everyone but is directed at lawyers who work at the national level and wish to enhance their understanding of international law standards in these areas, including with a view to bringing national rules more fully into line with international human rights.  The webinar is designed to be interactive in nature, allowing for participants to make observations, share their experiences and ask questions.

The webinar will be held on 13 May 2025 at 9:00 Eastern Time/15:00 Central European Time and will last for 1 1/2 hours. A draft agenda for the webinar is available here.

This webinar is being held as part of CLD’s Supporting the Establishment of Networks of Media Lawyers Globally project, funded by the Global Media Defence Fund managed by UNESCO. The project seeks to encourage the creation of and support national-level networks of legal professionals working to advance media freedom and freedom of expression. For more information on this project, please see https://www.law-democracy.org/projects/media-lawyers-networks.

You can register for this webinar at: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/or95umGbR1GNHa2ZGHUfiQ

For further information, please contact:

Raphael Vagliano
Legal Officer
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: raphael@law-democracy.org
+1 514 506-0948
www.law-democracy.org

Twitter: @law_democracy

15 April 2025.

Last year, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) analysed media policies issued by two provisional governments with control over territory in Myanmar, namely the Media Code of Conduct of the Interim Executive Council of Karenni State (Karenni IEC) and Chapter 12 of the Policy and Regulations for Conducting Tasks Relating to Information of the Karen National Union (KNU). The key issues raised in the CLD analysis were requirements for media and journalists to be authorised (licensed) to report from Karenni- or KNU-controlled territory and excessive content restrictions.

“We are very sensitive to the fact that these two provisional governments are engaged in active conflict with the military regime running Myanmar, and so our analysis drew on established practices by democratic military forces, including the rules which are being applied by Ukraine in that conflict,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “Despite that challenging context, our assessment is that both media policies go beyond what is necessary to enable military actors to pursue their legitimate aims.”

Some of CLD’s concerns with the two media policies include the following:

• • Any system of authorisation should be limited to accreditation to access operationally sensitive areas which are off limits to the general public, and should be run in a fair and transparent manner, ideally by an independent body.
  • Most of the content restrictions in the two policies should be removed and, instead, media professionalism should be overseen by the self-regulatory Independent Press Council of Myanmar (IPCM).
  • Journalists should not be required to wear uniforms or identifying clothing, especially where this may place them at risk.
  • The policies should set out clear and appropriate (proportionate) sanctions for breach of their rules.

The CLD analysis is available here and the two media policies are available here and here.

For further information, please contact:

Raphael Vagliano
Legal Officer
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: raphael@law-democracy.org
+1 514 506-0948
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

21 February 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) today released its analysis of the impact on access to information of the omnibus Bill No. 1, An Act Respecting Government Organization and Administration, tabled in parliament earlier this week by the Government of Nova Scotia, Canada. The analysis shows that despite claims by the government that the amendments “address long-standing inefficiencies” in the local access to information legislation, in fact they mostly give the government greater control over requests for information and the release of key reports by the Auditor General.

“It is extremely disappointing that a government which originally came into office promising positive reforms to the local access law is in fact seeking to obstruct access,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “The Progressive Conservatives won a super-majority in the November 2024 elections and, in such circumstances, it is incumbent upon them to show the greatest respect for democratic checks and balances, including access to information and the office of the Auditor General, instead of trying to hobble them.”

CLD has serious concerns with most of the proposed amendments as they impact access to information, of which the most important are:

• • • Unnecessarily requiring more specific details about the information being sought in a request for information, which could be abused by officials.

• • • Granting public bodies broad, discretionary powers to “disregard” requests for information, and not limiting this to “vexatious” requests or requiring the prior approval of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, as better practice jurisdictions do.

• • • Giving the Attorney General, who is also the Minister of Justice, conclusive power to declare certain information as being subject to solicitor-client privilege.

• • • Giving ministers the power to block the public release of reports by the Auditor General on the vague grounds that this is “in the public interest”.

The analysis is available here and the Bill is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

13 February 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) today released its analysis of Nepal’s Social Media Act (Bill) 2081, which was tabled in parliament in late January 2025. The Bill has multiple problems when assessed against international standards on freedom of expression, including that the extensive regulatory powers in the Bill are all exercised by government actors, that platforms, defined very broadly, are required to obtain a government licence, that it imposes numerous expansive and illegitimate content restrictions on both users and platforms, and that it utterly fails to put in place any systematic approach to addressing the harms caused by online content.

“We understand that this Bill is somehow an attempt to implement the UNESCO Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “If so, it certainly fails in every way to achieve that aim, suggesting the need for more support for and advocacy towards the government.”

CLD’s main recommendation is that the whole approach taken in the Bill should be reconsidered in favour of one which, instead of focusing almost exclusively on individual pieces of content, addresses the systematic impact of the operations of platforms. The analysis also puts forward numerous more specific recommendations, including the following:

• • The definition of “social media platform” should be much narrower in scope as, presently, it would include any website on which user comments were enabled.
  • No government-controlled actor should be able to exercise regulatory powers under this law; instead, an independent administrative body should be created for this purpose.
  • The whole approach of licensing platforms should be dropped; this is simply not needed to impose regulatory requirements on them.
  • If restrictions on individual pieces of content are retained at all, they should be very substantially reworked so as to bring them into line with international standards.
  • The many excessive sanctions should be revised and replaced with a regime which allows for proportionate sanctions to be imposed.

The analysis is available here and the Bill is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

29 January 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), in collaboration with the Maldives Journalists Association (MJA), recently launched the report Maldives: Overview of the Environment for Media, providing a broad look at the situation facing the media and journalists in the Maldives. The report is an updated version of a 2021 report by the same name prepared by CLD in collaboration with the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and MJA.

“The environment for freedom of expression and media freedom in the Maldives varies considerably based on the political environment,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “We call on the current government to preserve the positive elements of the legal framework while also introducing the needed improvements, as outlined in the report, to bring laws and practices into line with international standards.”

The report starts by providing an overview of international standards on freedom of expression, followed by an analysis of Maldivian constitutional guarantees. Subsequent sections of the report focus on regulation of the media, content restrictions and transparency, each broken down into sub-sections. The report concludes with a detailed “Blueprint for Change: Promoting Freedom of Expression”, which puts forward numerous recommendations, including the following:

• • Putting in place effective measures to end attacks on journalists for exercising their freedom of expression and to bring perpetrators to justice.
  • Repealing the Newspapers and Magazines Act, 1978.
  • Undertaking a comprehensive review of restrictions on content to bring them into line with international standards.
  • Amending the Communications Authority of Maldives Act and Broadcasting Act to ensure the independence of their respective regulators, namely the Communications Authority of Maldives and the Maldives Broadcasting
  • Bringing the Right to Information Act more fully into line with international standards, including by removing overbroad exceptions and empowering the Information Commissioner to enforce his or her decisions through a non-criminal judicial procedure.

The report is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

20 January 2025.

Today, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), in collaboration with the International Federation of Journalists, is launching the report Malaysia: Media Law Reform Blueprint. The report provides a broad look at the way regulation of the media works in Malaysia, assessing both historic legislation and the many new laws which been introduced recently. These do not deliver on the impressive promises Pakatan Harapan, the largest party in the Unity Government, made in the leadup to the 2022 elections, with some of the most problematical rules, including section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, actually having been made worse and some commitments, for example to repeal the Sedition Act 1948, having been resiled from.

“I think it is fair to say that most human rights observers were hoping for far more from this government,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “At the same time, there have been some positive developments, such as an encouraging draft Media Council Bill, although even there we have a number of recommendations which we hope the government will take into account.”

The report provides a detailed overview of key freedom of expression standards, including on regulation of the media and digital communications, the right to information, and restrictions on freedom of expression. It then assesses the Malaysian legal framework against those standards, looking at issues like the independence of regulatory bodies, efforts to promote diversity in the media, the regulation of the print and broadcast media and digital communications, and secrecy provisions, as well a number of the key content restrictions found in different laws.

The report makes numerous recommendations for reform, of which some of the key ones are:

• • Repeal entirely the Sedition Act 1948, the Official Secrets Act 1972 and the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984.
  • Move forward promptly to adopt a strong right to information law.
  • Reflect, in the legal environment for the media and digital communications, the ideas that bodies which regulate the media and digital communications should be independent of government and that a key aim of regulation should be to promote media diversity.
  • Introduce improvements to the Media Council Bill before adopting it.
  • Undertake a comprehensive review of the many restrictions on content in different laws with a view to amending them to bring them into line with international standards.

The report is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

16 January 2025.

You are invited to a webinar hosted by the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) on international freedom of expression standards on hate speech. The webinar will feature presentations from CLD in three different areas:

• International standards for legal prohibitions of hate speech.
• Standards for professional media regulation of discriminatory speech.
• Emerging standards on addressing discriminatory speech online (from a senior consultant to UNESCO on digital policy).

The webinar is directed at lawyers who work at the national level and wish to enhance their understanding of international law standards in these areas, including with a view to bringing national rules more fully into line with international human rights.

The webinar will be held 28 January 2025 and run from 8:30 to 10:00 Eastern Time/14:30 to 16:00 Central European Time. A draft agenda for the webinar is available here.

This webinar is being held as part of CLD’s Supporting the Establishment of Networks of Media Lawyers Globally project, funded by the Global Media Defence Fund managed by UNESCO. The project seeks to encourage the creation of and support national-level networks of legal professionals working to advance media freedom and freedom of expression. For more information on this project, please see https://www.law-democracy.org/projects/media-lawyers-networks.

You can register for this webinar at: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/qbpTNo2xRGWaQcxiFfnBvQ

For further information, please contact:

Raphael Vagliano
Legal Officer
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: raphael@law-democracy.org
+1 514 506-0948
www.law-democracy.org
Twitter: @law_democracy

14 January 2025.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), an international human rights organisation based in Halifax, Nova Scotia, will host up to four interns for the summer of 2025. The position will involve a range of substantive legal work in areas such as freedom of expression, media law, digital rights and access to information.

CLD provides expert legal services on foundational rights for democracy for the support and promotion of these rights around the world. Select recent projects include:

• • Providing training and support to journalists, parliamentarians, lawyers, judges and activists in different countries on media law and human rights issues.
  • Providing expert input into legal reform processes in different countries.
  • Supporting strategic litigation on the human rights issues we focus on.
  • Supporting the development of networks of media lawyers in several countries globally.
  • Maintaining a global ranking of right to information laws (RTI-Rating.org) and a methodology for assessing the quality of implementation of right to information laws.
  • Campaigning against global threats to digital rights, such as mass surveillance, Internet shutdowns and efforts to undermine encryption and digital security.

We ask interns to commit to at least three months of full-time work during the months of May to August. We normally ask interns to be based in our office in Halifax, since we believe being with us in-person provides a richer all-round experience for interns. However, applications for remote internships will also be considered on a case-by-case basis. These positions are unpaid and we encourage prospective interns to seek funding from their law schools or other sources.

CLD is known for providing its interns with a rich and varied substantive legal experience. As such, interns will have the opportunity to be directly involved in advancing the cause of human rights, normally in a range of countries, over the summer. For more information on CLD’s work, visit our website at www.law-democracy.org.

Those interested in applying should send a copy of their CV, cover letter and unofficial law school transcripts to raphael@law-democracy.org by 4 February 2025. Final candidates may be asked to provide a writing sample.

Successful candidates will have a strong academic record, excellent research skills, the ability to multi-task, and a demonstrated commitment to international law and human rights. Proficiency in additional languages and international experience are assets. Applicants should be current law students or recent graduates; on an exceptional basis we will consider candidates without a law background.

17 December 2024.

Today, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), in collaboration with a number of other civil society organisations which make up the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 Data Initiative, is launching a report on the role of SDG 16 in reducing poverty, SDG 16 Data Initiative 2024 Report: SDG 16 as a Key Vector for Eliminating Poverty. Addressing the scourge of poverty is a central premise of the SDGs, as reflected in the aim of SDG 1, which seeks to “end poverty in all its forms everywhere”, and the core mantra of the SDGs, namely to “leave no one behind. The report demonstrates the causal link between progress on a number of SDG 16 targets and poverty reduction.

“The transformative power of good governance, the core focus of SDG 16, in terms of driving development and also specifically reducing poverty, has long been recognised,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “This report provides concrete evidence of that power in relation to many of the SDG 16 targets, including access to information, which CLD’s chapter focuses on.”

The report contains five chapters looking at different SDG 16 targets, including Chapter 5: States Cannot Address Poverty in Secret, authored by Toby Mendel. The first part of Chapter 5 looks at the weak progress made so far in terms of SDG Indicator 16.10.2, which measures the adoption and implementation of right to information (RTI) laws, concluding that far more needs to be done both to reduce the number of 56 UN Member States which have still not adopted RTI laws and to improve the quality of those laws which have been adopted.

The second part of the chapter highlights the strong causal relationship between increasing transparency and improving poverty alleviation outcomes. This includes bolstering government accountability, including to expose ineffective development efforts, enhancing public participation in development efforts, including so as to ensure that they are properly tethered to the needs of the poor, and strengthening efforts to combat corruption, which has been shown to have a disproportionate impact on the poor.

The Report is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

29 November 2024.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) has made a submission to a public consultation by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) on their Draft Recommendation of the Council on Information Integrity (draft Recommendation). CLD’s Note provides analysis of and recommendations on key parts of the draft Recommendation, with a view to align the document better with international standards, with a particular focus on freedom of expression and the right to information.

“The draft Recommendation represents an important early official attempt to elaborate standards regarding information integrity and, as such, we very much welcome it,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “But our view is that it is too focused on misinformation and disinformation to the detriment of other threats to information integrity and we hope that revisions will be made to expand it.”

Some of CLD’s key recommendations are that the draft Recommendation should:

• • Include clarifying language to the recommendation targeting foreign influence operations to ensure that it is not weaponised against international civil society organisations or local civil society groups which receive foreign grants.
  • Include more binding language vis-à-vis Internet platforms, as opposed to mere encouragement, including in respect of their content recommender systems and meeting their human rights responsibilities.
  • Include stronger and clearer language on the need to improve, in the area of access to information, both the legal frameworks in most countries and implementation.

CLD’s Note is available here.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
X: @law_democracy

18 November 2024.

You are invited to a webinar hosted by the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) on international freedom of expression standards on digital rights, focusing on standards for regulating online speech and emerging practices for regulating digital platforms. The webinar will feature presentations from CLD on international standards on digital rights and platform regulation, as well as a presentation from the co-director of El Veinte, a Colombian civil society organisation which has been active in digital rights litigation. The webinar is directed at lawyers who work at the national level and wish to enhance their understanding of international law standards in these areas, including with a view to bringing national rules more fully into line with international human rights.

The webinar will be held on 27 November 2024 at 8:30 Eastern Time/14:30 Central European Time. A draft agenda for the webinar is available here.

This webinar is being held as part of CLD’s Supporting the Establishment of Networks of Media Lawyers Globally project, funded by the Global Media Defence Fund managed by UNESCO. The project seeks to encourage the creation of and support national-level networks of legal professionals working to advance media freedom and freedom of expression. For more information on this project, please see https://www.law-democracy.org/projects/media-lawyers-networks.

You can register for this webinar at: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZAvc-uhrTIpHNGar-mgbp7d56AoSSC74kSD

For further information, please contact:

Raphael Vagliano
Legal Officer
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: raphael@law-democracy.org
+1 514 506-0948
www.law-democracy.org
Twitter: @law_democracy

24 October 2024.

A new Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Freedom of Expression for Parliaments and Their Members is being launched on Monday, 28 October, and everyone who is interested in this subject is encouraged to take the course, which is available in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese (see links below). The course was developed by the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD), and commissioned by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The primary aim of the course is to develop the skills and capacity of members of parliament, parliamentary staff, and civil society organisations, academics and others who focus on parliaments, so as to protect and promote freedom of expression inside and outside of parliament.

“This course provides an excellent introduction for parliamentarians to international standards on freedom of expression,” said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of CLD. “We believe the need for this course has never been higher, as parliamentarians around the world grapple with how to protect the right to freedom of expression in an increasingly challenging digital environment.”

The course features a range of pedagogical tools, including readings, games and quizzes, as well as videos by internationally recognised experts and members of parliament from around the world, who share their knowledge, expertise and relevant parliamentary experiences. A core background document for this course is a 2018 IPU publication authored by Toby Mendel, Freedom of expression for parliaments and their members: Importance and scope of protection.

You can register for this free, self-paced course at the following links in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. The course will go live on 28 October 2024. Those who complete the course will receive a certificate.

For further information, please contact:

Toby Mendel
Executive Director
Centre for Law and Democracy
Email: toby@law-democracy.org
+1 902 431-3686
www.law-democracy.org
Twitter: @law_democracy